As we close out March 2026, markets find themselves at a critical juncture. The Iran War has officially crossed its one-month mark, and what began as a localized conflict has evolved into a genuine stress test for global financial markets. With oil prices breaching psychologically important levels and Treasury yields approaching zones that historically triggered policy intervention, we're witnessing a recalibration that demands attention.

But here's what makes this moment particularly intriguing: the technical setup is starting to tell a different story than the headlines. We're seeing sentiment reach extreme levels, option activity that typically precedes reversals, and oversold conditions that haven't been this pronounced since the depths of previous market corrections. The question isn't whether markets are under pressure. That much is obvious. The question is whether we're approaching the kind of inflection point that separates those who react from those who anticipate.

This week, we'll examine why the bond market may force President Trump's hand sooner than many expect. We'll explore how a single technology announcement from Google could reshape the entire semiconductor landscape. And we'll analyze why stocks with the most bearish sentiment may paradoxically offer the most compelling opportunities in the weeks ahead.

The market rarely provides perfect clarity, but it often provides clues. This week's report aims to connect those dots.

The S&P 500 closed last week down 2.15% at 6,369, marking a continuation of the downward pressure that has dominated March trading. Both the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the Nasdaq 100 officially entered correction territory, defined as a decline of 10% or more from recent highs. The catalyst for this weakness remained centered on the ongoing Iran conflict, which has now persisted for over 30 days with limited signs of resolution.

The week began with President Trump announcing a five-day pause on US and Israeli strikes targeting Iranian power plants. This announcement initially sent stocks sharply higher and pushed oil prices lower as markets interpreted it as a potential de-escalation signal. However, as the week progressed, this optimism quickly faded. Oil prices resumed their upward trajectory, and equity markets gave back their gains.

On March 26th, President Trump extended the pause on power plant strikes for an additional ten days. The market reaction to this second announcement was notably different from the first. Rather than sparking another relief rally, oil prices erased their initial decline within an hour and pushed back above $100 per barrel by Friday's close. This diminished response highlights a concerning trend: the efficacy of such announcements appears to be decreasing rapidly.

Iranian officials accused the US and Israel of continuing to strike power infrastructure despite the announced pause, labeling these statements as "lies" and suggesting that trust in US diplomatic overtures has eroded significantly. This dynamic creates a challenging environment where traditional diplomatic tools appear less effective with each passing week.

From a technical perspective, the S&P 500 reached its lowest level in 232 days, closing well below the 6,405 daily bottom Bollinger Band. The daily RSI dropped to approximately 29, indicating severely oversold conditions. The index also broke below the bottom end of its downward trending channel at 6,450 on March 27th, confirming the technical breakdown that many had been monitoring.

While energy markets captured headlines, we believe the bond market has emerged as a potentially bigger issue for the administration and broader financial stability. The ten-year Treasury note yield surged toward 4.50% last week, approaching what has historically been a critical threshold for policy intervention.

During the intense volatility of the early 2025 trade war, the 4.50% to 4.70% zone on the ten-year yield proved to be what we call President Trump's "Policy Shift Zone." When yields reached these levels previously, it ultimately led to the announcement of a 90-day tariff pause in April 2025. The pattern suggests that the administration views sustained yields above this level as economically untenable.

The market's expectations for Federal Reserve policy have shifted dramatically. The current base case shows a prolonged Fed pause extending until December 2027, with a rising 51% probability of an actual interest rate hike over the next twelve months. This represents a complete reversal from the rate cut expectations that dominated sentiment just months ago.

This policy trajectory appears unsustainable given the persistent weakness in labor market data. Remember, labor market concerns were the original driver of the Fed's pivot toward accommodation in September 2025. The disconnect between deteriorating employment conditions and tightening financial conditions creates a policy puzzle that will need resolution.

We believe that if nothing changes in the current trajectory, yields will continue to push higher and impose substantial pressure on economic activity. History suggests that when bond market stress reaches these levels, the Trump administration moves to contain it. We think intervention in some form becomes increasingly likely this week.

Investor sentiment reached levels that historically have preceded market bounces. Overall sentiment fell to a point where there is nearly an 84% probability that stock prices will be higher one month from now based on current readings. While investors became modestly more bullish during the week, reducing this probability slightly, the signal remains strongly positive for near-term performance.

The equity-only put/call ratio tells an even more compelling story. The 20-day average of this ratio has been climbing steadily since the peak of earnings season in January, rising from 0.58 to 0.68. When the put/call ratio has increased by this magnitude over a two-month period in the past, the S&P 500 has averaged a gain of 1.9% over the subsequent month and was higher 69% of the time.

What's particularly noteworthy is the behavior seen in the final week of March. On Friday, March 20th, the equity-only put/call ratio stood at 0.81. Despite the S&P 500 continuing to decline through the week with a 2.2% loss, the ratio had fallen to 0.56 by Friday, March 27th. This increase in call buying while the market was falling has only been observed approximately 20 times over the past 20 years.

Historically, this pattern has signaled short-term bounces even during sustained bear markets. When this combination has appeared previously, the S&P 500 was higher one month later 80% of the time with an average gain of 6.0%. The last occurrence was on April 10th of last year following Liberation Day, and before that, on November 26, 2007, just one month before the 2008 recession began. In both cases, stocks rallied over the subsequent month despite the different longer-term outcomes.

While we're not convinced that a long-term bottom is in place, the evidence suggests we're due for at least a short-term relief rally. The downside target we had been monitoring has been reached, with the Nasdaq 100 hitting the price objective outlined in our previous analysis. There remains downside room before support is reached, but multiple technical factors are now building that typically precede bounces.

The current technical configuration shows the S&P 500 trading well below its daily bottom Bollinger Band at 6,405, with a daily RSI around 29. These oversold readings, combined with the break below the downward trending channel at 6,450, suggest that the market has reached a level where reflexive buying often emerges. We believe a relief rally is needed at minimum on the basis of severely oversold technicals and what we expect will be imminent intervention by the Trump administration to stabilize financial conditions.

From a broader perspective, we've been emphasizing that long-term bear markets typically don't develop without at least one failed rally attempt first. This pattern held in November 2007, during 2022, and in most other bear markets as Elliott Wave theorists frequently point out. Last week's price action and option activity suggest we're closer to seeing such a rally attempt materialize.

We're now positioned to lean on the long side while continuing to look for short-term shorting opportunities after earnings releases. This isn't dramatically different from our previous stance, but we were previously more neutral. The shift reflects our view that the risk-reward for tactical long positions has improved meaningfully.

We think the timing of President Trump's "peace talks" announcement on March 23rd was not coincidental. It came as the ten-year Treasury yield was approaching the 4.50% threshold that has historically prompted policy responses. The question now becomes how much influence the administration can maintain over the bond market, which has clearly diminished over recent weeks as seen in oil and equity market reactions.

Unless President Trump is willing to weather a major recession for the Iran conflict, we believe something has to give in the coming days. The iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) attempted a relief rally mid-week, rising to $86.88 on March 25th, before turning lower and forming a new low at $85.45 on March 27th. The daily RSI has fallen back to approximately 37 at trendline support, and the daily bottom Bollinger Band has begun to flatten at $84.99.

This technical setup will ultimately depend on how far President Trump is willing to push the conflict before prioritizing domestic economic stability. We expect this question to be answered this week. The bond market has a way of forcing policy shifts, and we're approaching that inflection point.

The overall stock market weakness last week took semiconductors down with it, but we observed money leaving the group even as overall prices held above recent lows. Our Net Buying indicator for semiconductors fell to new lows, generating a sell signal as the Semiconductor ETF (XSD) flagged following a break of its recent trendline.

The fundamental story behind this weakness goes beyond typical market correlation. Only 17% of semiconductor stocks are higher since reporting earnings, and 66% are underperforming the S&P 500. The driver of this underperformance relates to a significant development in AI efficiency that could reshape demand expectations.

Last week, Google announced TurboQuant, a new efficiency technique that focuses on reducing memory usage during AI inference. AI models store intermediate information in a key-value cache, which grows quickly with longer prompts and conversations. TurboQuant dramatically reduces this memory requirement without sacrificing accuracy, resulting in computation that is 8x faster while reducing memory usage by 6x.

The implication for hardware demand is significant. If major cloud providers suddenly need one-sixth of the memory they previously expected, future memory purchases are likely at minimum on hold, and the need for additional capacity expansion comes into question. This matters because memory providers have been benefiting from tight supply conditions as they deliberately kept capacity additions modest following the post-COVID demand collapse.

While TurboQuant is still in the research stage, Google expects to begin implementation in about three months. Amazon and Microsoft are likely to follow with similar efficiency improvements. These companies are currently booking memory orders through the end of 2026 and into 2027. If their requirements drop by such a substantial factor, it creates uncertainty around the entire memory supply-demand balance that has supported pricing and margins.

Since Google's announcement, memory spot prices have ticked lower for the first time in months. Micron Technology, which effectively trades as a commodity stock tied to DRAM and NAND pricing, broke below $365 support on Thursday for the first time since early January. There is trendline support around $320, but we see downside room potentially to $280 or lower if this efficiency trend accelerates.

WTI crude for May 2026 delivery closed the week 3.48% higher at $100.59 per barrel, reaching its highest level in more than three years. The move above the psychologically important $100 threshold came despite President Trump's attempts to negotiate with Iran and ease market fears about the massive supply disruption affecting Middle East crude flows.

President Trump's March 26th decision to extend the pause on Iranian power plant strikes by an additional ten days failed to provide the supply reassurance markets were seeking. Meanwhile, two container vessels owned by China Ocean Shipping Company attempted to pass through the Strait of Hormuz but were turned back. This marked the first attempt by a major container carrier to cross the strategic waterway since the conflict began, and its failure underscores the continuing closure of this vital trade route.

Iran's war strategy appears focused on pressuring the US, Israel, and their allies through capital markets rather than through overwhelming military force. This approach makes strategic sense given that Iran cannot outcompete the US and Israel purely through military capability. By maintaining control over the Strait of Hormuz and denying peace talks until specific conditions are met, Iran maintains leverage over the conflict's direction and timing.

We expect this strategy to remain in place until the conflict's conclusion, which means significantly higher volatility in energy markets should continue. As time progresses and more Trump-based headlines are denied or proven ineffective, the impact of such announcements on market pricing diminishes further. This creates a scenario where fundamental supply concerns increasingly dominate over diplomatic developments.

From a technical standpoint, our previous bearish setup materialized exactly as expected, with our $87 target being met on March 23rd. However, this came with a prompt bounce off $85 support and approximately 55 RSI support level. Price action then reversed above $90 and pushed above $98 downtrend resistance on March 27th.

The daily bottom Bollinger Band has begun shifting higher, now standing at $72.67, while the daily top Bollinger Band has remained elevated at $106.64. While these technical levels matter, we believe they will be secondary to the near-term fundamental situation, as is typically the case during periods of military conflict affecting major supply routes.

Given the dominance of fundamental drivers and the conflicting signals from diplomatic versus supply-reality dynamics, we have elected to take a neutral outlook into the current week. We will reevaluate the situation early in the week as events develop.

Natural gas prices for May 2026 delivery ended the week 2.89% lower at $3.03 per million BTU. Prices have remained relatively contained despite the ongoing Middle East conflict, which stands in stark contrast to the volatility seen in crude oil markets.

We believe this divergence exists because bearish shoulder season fundamentals in the US continue to overshadow developments in the global energy market. Natural gas markets remain relatively isolated in the US, with domestic supply-demand dynamics driving prices rather than geopolitical risk premiums. Ample supplies and unsupportive weather forecasts have restrained any potential rally.

Last week's temperature patterns featured cold conditions in the East and record-setting heat in the West, but forecasts show a shift toward more seasonal temperatures across much of the country through the first week of April. Mild weather is expected for most key population centers, which typically reduces heating and cooling demand during this transitional period.

The EIA reported that natural gas inventories fell to 1,829 Bcf, down 54 Bcf from the previous week. This draw exceeded expectations of a 49 Bcf decline. However, stocks were 90 Bcf higher than last year at this time and 14 Bcf above the five-year average of 1,815 Bcf, indicating adequate supply conditions.

From a technical perspective, the early rejection of $3.15 downtrend resistance on March 23rd confirmed another failure at approximately 50 on the daily RSI. This sent prices below our $2.90 target. Support was found in the $2.80 to $2.90 range as expected, leading to a rebound off roughly 40 RSI support into $3.05 resistance on Friday.

The daily RSI remains below 50, and the daily top Bollinger Band has shifted down to $3.24. Price action appears to be rejecting the $3.00 to $3.10 resistance zone. We believe this is setting up another lower high followed by a move toward long-term support at $2.80. We think weak fundamentals heading into the spring season are poised to weigh on prices further.

Gold prices for April 2026 delivery closed the week 1.78% lower at $4,503 per ounce, retreating from recent record levels even as the US Dollar Index rebounded above 100.00 resistance and the S&P 500 approached correction territory. This inverse relationship between gold and risk assets, which had been supportive of gold during previous phases of market stress, temporarily broke down last week.

Rising inflation expectations have shifted Federal Reserve policy outlook toward potential rate hikes rather than the cuts that were priced in earlier this year. Higher interest rates typically weigh on gold by increasing the opportunity cost of holding the non-yielding asset. However, it has become increasingly evident that gold remains the primary safe haven trade and inflation hedge in the current environment, particularly as Treasury securities lose some of their traditional safe haven appeal due to yield volatility.

The US Treasury yield situation continues to worsen, with the ten-year note yield rising toward 4.50% last week. This creates a challenging backdrop where rising real yields compete with gold's safe haven demand. Meanwhile, the Dollar Index continues to look overbought with the 100.54 high from March 13th still holding as resistance. The daily RSI has risen into approximately 62 resistance, and the daily top Bollinger Band has shifted lower again to 100.44.

We believe the recent weakness in gold has actually resulted in another major bottom formation for the metal. This view is particularly supported by what appeared to be a significant liquidation event during the week of March 16th. Gold's long-term fundamental narrative has only strengthened as inflation is set to surge and bonds lose their safe haven status given yield instability.

Gold prices fell to a low of $4,100 during overnight trading on March 23rd, before regular market hours opened. This decline appeared to mark a capitulation point for gold markets. The move came with a cross below the daily bottom Bollinger Band by nearly 10%, which was trading at $4,568 at the time. The daily RSI dropped to approximately 26, marking the most oversold level since October 2023.

Since that low, price action has been constructive. Gold recovered above $4,500 on March 27th, and we believe the $4,601 high from March 25th is positioned to be broken in the coming days. The daily RSI is now trading in an upward divergent pattern, which typically precedes renewed strength.

The technical correction has improved the sustainability of the uptrend by resetting momentum indicators to healthier levels. The daily bottom Bollinger Band has now reached $3,877, its highest level on record, indicating that long-term support continues to rise. The daily top Bollinger Band remains elevated at $4,312, suggesting significant upside potential from current levels.

We expect a sustained move above the $4,500 level this week to clear the path toward $4,600 and ultimately new record highs. The combination of improved technical positioning, strong fundamental support from inflation concerns and geopolitical instability, and the likely temporary nature of Dollar strength creates what we think is a compelling setup for renewed gains in precious metals.

Nike reports third-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings on Tuesday, March 31st after market close. Consensus expectations call for earnings per share of $0.39 on revenue of $11.29 billion. While we believe in Nike's longer-term turnaround story and want exposure to the stock, timing entry around this particular earnings report carries elevated risk based on seasonal patterns and current fundamental challenges.

Over the past 20 years, Nike has demonstrated consistent positive reactions to earnings beats across most quarters. However, third-quarter results represent a notable exception to this pattern. When reporting third-quarter earnings, the stock has gapped lower 57% of the time with an average decline of 0.4%. This stands in contrast to the other three quarters of the year, where positive earnings surprises typically drive stock appreciation.

The weakness associated with third-quarter reports extends beyond the immediate earnings reaction. If you had purchased Nike stock immediately before third-quarter earnings and held through the quarter until just before fourth-quarter earnings, you would have experienced losses 62% of the time. The average quarterly loss was 0.1%, compared to an average gain of 4.2% for the other three quarters combined.

Sentiment patterns reinforce this seasonal weakness. When market sentiment has been bearish heading into third-quarter earnings, investors have typically been correct in their pessimism. Under these conditions, Nike stock has gapped lower 70% of the time with an average gap of 2.2%. Conversely, when sentiment has been bullish going into third-quarter reports, the stock has averaged a gap higher of 3.4% and was positive 68% of the time.

Nike's turnaround remains legitimate and is making progress. The company benefits from new product cycles, improving wholesale momentum, and signs of stabilization in its critical North America market. However, the path forward has become choppier than initially hoped when the turnaround strategy was announced.

China continues to represent a significant weak spot in Nike's global portfolio. Demand in this market has been softer than expected, creating a headwind to overall growth despite strength in other regions. Additionally, the company faces margin pressure from both tariff-related costs and the operational investments required to execute its transformation strategy.

While Nike is likely to clear the earnings bar for the third quarter based on recent momentum, the key risk lies in fourth-quarter guidance. Elevated input costs, persistent China weakness, and margin pressure from tariffs create a challenging environment for providing optimistic forward guidance. Commentary suggesting continued near-term headwinds could overshadow a solid third-quarter performance.

Historically, Nike shares have gapped lower 92% of the time when the company has issued negative guidance, with an average decline of 6.5%. Given the current fundamental backdrop, the risk of cautious forward commentary appears elevated for this report.

From a technical perspective, Nike stock is currently trading around $52.50 after declining meaningfully from higher levels earlier this year. The stock has found support in the low $50s on multiple occasions, but a break below this level would open downside room back toward the $45 to $47 range.

Current sentiment reads at negative 8.1%, indicating bearish positioning heading into the report. This aligns with the historical pattern where bearish sentiment before third-quarter earnings has typically preceded disappointing stock performance. The combination of seasonal weakness, fundamental uncertainties around guidance, and negative sentiment creates a setup where we think patience is warranted.

We believe in Nike's turnaround story over a multi-quarter horizon. The company possesses strong brand equity, is making necessary strategic adjustments, and operates in categories with long-term growth potential. However, the third-quarter earnings report may not provide the optimal entry point given historical patterns and near-term headwinds.

For those considering the stock, we think it may be prudent to wait for the earnings event to pass and evaluate the actual results, guidance, and subsequent price action before establishing positions. If the company surprises positively on guidance despite the challenging backdrop, that would represent a clearer bullish signal. Conversely, if cautious commentary drives the stock lower as seasonal patterns suggest is likely, it would create a more attractive entry point for longer-term positions.

We are currently positioned modestly net short the overall stock market. This stance reflects our recognition of the ongoing pressures from the Iran conflict, rising Treasury yields, and technical breakdown that occurred last week. However, as detailed throughout this report, we believe the setup is increasingly supportive of at least a short-term relief rally.

Our net short positioning primarily results from being stopped out of many long positions as support levels broke during March's decline, rather than from aggressive new short initiation. We have shifted our strategy to lean toward the long side while remaining alert for short-term shorting opportunities following earnings releases where valuations appear stretched or guidance disappoints.

Within our active positions, we maintain a short in RH ahead of the company's earnings report scheduled for Tuesday, March 31st after market close. This position reflects our concerns about the delayed earnings announcement, potential for cautious guidance given weak furniture industry fundamentals, and extremely crowded bearish sentiment that we think reflects real underlying weakness rather than excessive pessimism.

For the S&P 500, we think the technical setup has improved meaningfully for a bounce attempt. The index reached severely oversold levels with a daily RSI near 29, closed well below the daily bottom Bollinger Band at 6,405, and broke below downward channel support at 6,450. These conditions, combined with sentiment extremes and unusual option activity patterns detailed earlier in this report, suggest reflexive buying could emerge.

We expect policy intervention from the Trump administration as Treasury yields approach the 4.50% zone that historically has prompted action. Unless the administration is willing to accept a major recession to pursue the Iran conflict, something will need to give on either the diplomatic or financial conditions front. We think this inflection point arrives soon, potentially this week.

However, we're not declaring that a long-term bottom is in place. Bear markets typically require at least one failed rally attempt before establishing sustainable lows. The November 2007 example is instructive: sentiment reached extremes, technical indicators showed oversold conditions, and a sharp rally ensued. Yet that rally ultimately failed, and the market continued to significantly lower levels as the financial crisis unfolded.

The key will be monitoring how any relief rally develops and whether it can sustain momentum or exhausts quickly. Failed rallies that cannot reclaim key resistance levels or maintain upside momentum for more than a few weeks would suggest the bear case remains intact. Conversely, a rally that regains broken support levels and holds them on subsequent tests would indicate more durable stabilization.

Within equity markets, we continue to view semiconductor weakness as a sector-specific headwind rather than a broader market signal. The Google TurboQuant announcement represents a genuine structural challenge to memory demand assumptions that have supported the group. Until there is clarity on how quickly efficiency improvements get adopted and whether other hyperscalers develop similar technologies, we think semiconductors face an uphill battle.

Energy markets remain driven by geopolitical developments more than technical factors. Our neutral stance on crude oil reflects this fundamental dominance and the diminishing impact of diplomatic announcements. Natural gas continues to trade on domestic fundamentals with bearish seasonal pressures likely to persist into April. We think natural gas prices have further downside toward $2.80 as spring shoulder season demand weakness becomes more apparent.

Gold's technical reset has created what we view as an attractive longer-term entry point for precious metals exposure. The move down to $4,100 appears to have flushed out weak hands, and the subsequent recovery above $4,500 suggests renewed buying interest. We expect gold to establish new record highs this year as inflation pressures build and bonds lose safe haven appeal amid yield volatility.

For fixed income, we think the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF offers value at current levels around $85 to $86. Treasury yields approaching 4.50% historically have not been sustainable without policy intervention, and we expect the Trump administration will act to contain further upside in yields. A move back toward $93 on TLT appears achievable over the next several weeks as intervention emerges and rate hike expectations moderate.

The primary risk to our more constructive near-term view would be further deterioration in Middle East conditions without accompanying policy response. If the Iran conflict escalates beyond current levels or diplomatic efforts completely break down, the relief rally thesis would be challenged. Similarly, if Treasury yields break decisively above 4.70% without intervention, it would signal that the administration's influence over markets has diminished more than we expect.

On the upside, a quicker than expected diplomatic breakthrough or meaningful de-escalation would likely spark a more sustained rally than the tactical bounce we're anticipating. In that scenario, our gradual shift toward long positioning would benefit, though we would want to see confirmation through multiple days of follow-through before increasing conviction.

We remain focused on the Iran War, Treasury yields, and policy responses as the key variables that will determine whether this becomes a short-term relief rally or the beginning of more sustained stabilization. The coming week should provide important clarity on all three fronts.

We want to hear from you. Hit reply and tell us:

What's your biggest investment challenge right now?

In what other ways can we help you?

Whether it's timing entries, managing risk, or identifying the next major opportunity—we read every response and use your feedback to make our research even more valuable.

Here's to your financial success,

Sincerely,

7AM Team

^{IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER}

^{This report represents analysis and opinion rather than investment advice or recommendations. All views expressed reflect our current thinking and may change as new information becomes available. Past performance does not guarantee future results.}

^{Readers should conduct their own research and consult with qualified financial advisors before making investment decisions. Market conditions can change rapidly, and positions discussed may not be suitable for all investors depending on individual circumstances, risk tolerance, and investment objectives.}

^{The information provided is believed to be accurate but is not guaranteed. We do not warrant the completeness or timeliness of information presented. Investing involves risk including possible loss of principal. There is no assurance that any investment strategy will achieve its objectives.}